Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently April 1988 · most notably Aaron v. State (1960), Lee v. State (1957)
70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. State · Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Gonzalez · Cross v. State · Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. Blackwell · 31 Ala. App. 21 - Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Only review of rulings on trial with respect to matters of evidence are within the scope of the statute obviating the necessity of interposing seasonable objection and exception. Code 1940, Title 15, § 382(10), 1951 Cum.Pocket Part, Vol. 4, p. 103; Broadway v. State, 257 Ala. 414 , 60 So.2d 701 (4); Townsell v. State, 255 Ala. 495 (4), 52 So.2d 186 ; James v. State, 246 Ala. 617 , 21 So.2d 847 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hamilton v. State“The general rule is that improper argument of counsel is not ground for a new trial or the subject of review on appeal unless there is due objection by counsel or a motion to exclude, a ruling thereon by the court, an exception thereto, or a refusal of the court to make a ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.