Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Ark. 486 - Sandy v. Salter

Sandy v. Salter’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably 48 Cal. 3d 341 - S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989), 10 Ark. App. 28 - Silvicraft, Inc. v. Lambert (1983)

26 state decisions

1601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hollingsworth & Frazier v. Barnett · Clarksville Meat Co. v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he law should consider, in determining whether an employer-employee status exists, not only the matter of control but also the relationship between the claimant’s own occupation and the regular business of the asserted employer. Larson, [Workmen’s Compensation Law] §§ 43.50 and 43.51. With regard to the latter aspect of the problem, two considerations have weight: First, how much of a separate calling or profession is the claimant’s occupation? How skilled is it? To what extent may it be expected to carry its own share of the Workmen’s Compensation responsibility? Second, what relationship does the claimant’s work bear to the regular business of the asserted employer? Is there a continuous connection or only an intermittent one, or is there no connection at all?”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.