260 Cal. App. 2d 626 - Simon v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1976
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 690 - Primm v. Primm · Overton v. Vita-Food Corp. · 39 Cal. 2d 858 - De Burgh v. De Burgh · Nunes v. Nunes · 18 Cal. 2d 445 - Keener v. Keener
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘With rhythmic regularity it is necessary for us to say that, where the findings are attacked for insufficiency of the .evidence, our power begins and ends with a determination as to whether there is any substantial evidence to support them; _, . .’ [Citations.] Moreover, it is incumbent upon the appellant who .contends that the evidence is insufficient to set forth the evidence in support of the judgment and indicate wherein it is insufficient. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.