Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 Conn. 936

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 2002

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2002-06-18

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2017

1 district · 13 state decisions

Relies on State v. Thompson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 299 (AC 21588), is granted, limited to the following issues:

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor’s three improper remarks in rebuttal argument required reversal of the judgment of conviction?

¶3“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) the trial court improperly permitted one witness to testify as to the credibility of another; and (b) that ruling constituted harmful error?”

¶4VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.Moira L. Buckley, assistant public defender, in opposition.Decided June 18, 2002
/260/conn/936 · .json · Public domain