Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 F.1d 74 - Maytag v. Cummins

Maytag v. Cummins’s Empirical Analysis

260 F. 74 · 1919

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2000

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

501919192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Company v. Roy · Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lansden · Waldron v. Waldron · Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co. · Turner v. American Security & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that if evidence has been erroneously admitted during the trial, the error of its admission is cured by its subsequent withdrawal before the close of the trial or by a clear peremptory instruction to the jury to disregard it. [Citations] “But there is an exception to this rule. It is that, where the appellate court perceives from an examination of the record that the inadmissible evidence made such a strong impression upon the minds of the jury that its subsequent withdrawal or the instruction to disregard it probably failed to eradicate the injurious effect of it from the minds of the jury, there the defeated party did not have a fair trial of his case, and a new trial should be granted. [Citations].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.