Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 F.1d 788 - Wilson v. Day

Wilson v. Day’s Empirical Analysis

260 F. 788 · 1919

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 1993
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1993

4 federal appellate ·

30191919201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Buckley v. Superior Court of San Francisco · Wheeler v. Bolton · 30 Cal. App. 452 - Moore v. Lauff · Cardoner v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the difficulty of estimating its value appear to have made her friends and others to whom she went exceedingly careful in giving her counsel, and all appear to have advised or conferred with her in the best of faith and with no wish other than to be fair and frank. Possessed of all the knowledge that her friends and advisers and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.