Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 F.2d 345 - Johnston v. United States

Johnston v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

260 F.2d 345 · 1958

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
4
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 1984 · most notably Ogden v. United States (1962), State v. Coleman (1965)

39 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

2201958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Sweet v. United States · Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Cannon v. Ellis · Portomene v. United States · Brown v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendants contend-that the court erred in permitting an agent of the F.B.I. to sit at the counsel table and assist the government in the presentation of evidence after the court had invoked the rule excluding witnesses. This agent did not testify at the trial, and the defendants were not prejudiced by his presence. The question of whether witnesses should be excluded from the court room while not testifying is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and is subject to review only upon a showing of abuse of that discretion or manifest injustice. Oliver v. United States, 10 Cir., 121 F.2d 245 , and cases cited. Furthermore, unless there is an abuse of discretion, it is not error for a trial court to permit an officer of the United States to remain in the court room throughout the trial and advise counsel for the government, even though the officer testified as a witness.’’ (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.