Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 F.2d 486

Docket No. 14367.

James E. Roberts v. Gladys S. Roberts

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 24, 1958. Decided Oct. 9, 1958, Petition for Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1958.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1959

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. George E. C. Hayes, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. James A. Cobb, Julian R. Dugas and Luke C. Moore, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Joseph C. Waddy, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. William C. Gardner, William B. Bryant, and Marion C. George, Jr., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case is before us on appeal from a judgment of the District Court declaring a decree of divorce entered December 7, 1955, in the Chancery Court of Garland County, Arkansas, in the case of James E. Roberts v. Gladys S. Roberts to be null and void, and holding that the interests and rights of the appellee in certain premises in the District of Columbia are unaffected by the said decree.

¶2

We have carefully considered the transcript, as appellant had asked us to do. We are satisfied that appellant has failed to sustain his burden of persuading us that we should reject the findings and conclusions of the trier and substitute others favorable to him.

Accordingly, the judgment should be and is

¶3

Affirmed.

/260/f2d/486 · .json · Public domain