Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 F.2d 955

Docket No. 168.

Docket Docket 25391.

Denis v. Murff

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued November 7, 1958.

Decided November 20, 1958.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-11-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1958

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Nathan Kestnbaum, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City (Arthur H. Christy, U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, WATERMAN, Circuit Judge, and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The record shows no adequate grounds for interference with the administrative proceedings for deportation of this petitioner. There is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Special Inquiry Officer and the Board of Immigration Appeals that petitioner engaged in prostitution, as well as their rejection of her assertion, as to the statement she gave an Immigration and Naturalization Service Investigator, that she did not understand the questions asked her and that prior to making the statement she had asked for and been denied an opportunity to consult with counsel.

¶2

Affirmed.

/260/f2d/955 · .json · Public domain