Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority’s Empirical Analysis
260 F.3d 1071 · 2001
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Norton (2003), Harold Dawavendewa Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District an Arizona (2002)
24 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Powell · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co · White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the law touches “exclusive rights of self-governance in purely intramural matters”; (2) the application of the law to the tribe would “abrogate rights guaranteed by Indian treaties”; or (3) there is proof “by legislative history or some other means that Congress intended [the law] not to apply to Indians on their reservations.In any of these three situations, Congress must expressly apply a statute to Indians before we will hold that it reaches them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The scope of the judicial inquiry in an EEOC or any other agency subpoena enforcement proceeding is quite narrow. The critical questions are: (1) whether Congress has granted the authority to investigate; (2) whether procedural requirements have been followed; and (3) whether the evidence is relevant and material to the investigation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is ... simply a business entity that happens to be run by a tribe or its members.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.