Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 F.3d 27 - in Re: Robert Spigel

in Re: Robert Spigel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

116 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably In Re Frank Schifano (2004), Haney v. Copeland (In Re Copeland) (2003)

116 district ·

940200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Brown III v. Felsen · Field v. Mans · Palmacci v. Umpierrez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the debtor made a knowingly false representation or one made in reckless disregard of the truth; (2) the debtor intended to deceive; (3) the debtor intended to induce the creditor to rely upon the false statement; (4) the creditor actually relied upon the misrepresentation; (5) the creditor’s reliance was justifiable; and (6) the reliance upon the false statement caused damage.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(2) for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by— (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, as to any essential factual element of its claim on which the nonmovant would bear the burden of proof at trial, its failure to come forward with sufficient evidence to generate a trialworthy issue warrants summary judgment to the moving party.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.