Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 F.3d 330 - Celia Chiu

Celia Chiu’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably University & Community College System v. Nevadans for Sound Government (2004), 346 F. Supp. 2d 853 - Roberts v. Haragan (2004)

3 district · 5 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government does not create a public forum by inaction or by permitting limited discourse, but only by intentionally opening a nontraditional forum for public discourse. Accordingly, the Court has looked to the policy and practice of the government to ascertain whether it intended to designate a place not tradi- tionaUy open to assembly and debate as a public forum. The Court has also examined the nature of the property and its compatibility with expressive activity to discern the government’s intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we can review the materiality of any factual disputes, but not their genuineness. " Wagner v. Bay City, 227 F.3d 316 , 320 (5th Cir.2000)(emphasis in original). "In making this legal determination on the materiality of the facts at issue, we review the complaint and record to determine whether, assuming that all of [Plaintiff's] factual assertions are true, those facts are materially sufficient to establish that defendants acted in an objectively unreasonable manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In addition to traditional public forums, a public forum may be created by government designation of a place or channel of communication for use by the public at large for assembly and speech, for use by certain speakers, or for the discussion of certain subjects. . . . The state's power to restrict speakers' access to this category of public forum is subject to the same first amendment constraints that apply to traditional public forums.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.