McGuire v. Reilly’s Empirical Analysis
260 F.3d 36 · 2001
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Nieves-Márquez v. Puerto Rico (2003), 134 S. Ct. 2518 - McCullen v. Coakley (2014)
42 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Palko v. State of Connecticut · City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. · Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person shall knowingly enter or remain on a public way or sidewalk adjacent to a reproductive health care facility within a radius of 35 feet of any portion of an entrance, exit or driveway of a reproductive health care facility or within the area within a rectangle created by extending the outside boundaries of any entrance, exit or driveway of a reproductive health care facility in straight lines to the point where such lines intersect the sideline of the street in front of such entrance, exit or driveway.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Expression, whether oral or written or symbolized by conduct, is subject to reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions. We have often noted that restric tions of this kind are valid provided that they are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mistook the law, clearly erred in its factual assessments, or otherwise abused its discretion in granting”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.