Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 FRD 682 - Kipperman v. Onex Corp.

Kipperman v. Onex Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co. · Chudasama · In Re: Sunshine Jr. Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) consistent with these rules and warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law, or for establishing new law; (ii) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; and (iii) neither unreasonable nor unduly burdensome or expensive, considering the needs of the case, prior discovery in the case, the amount in controversy, and the importance of the issues at stake in the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.