Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 Ga. 323

In re Carmichael

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1990

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1990-07-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1997

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per curiam.

¶1Respondent, Wayne F. Carmichael, wilfully abandoned a legal matter entrusted to him by a client to the detriment of that client in violation of Standard 44. The Respondent also failed to promptly account for property entrusted to him in a fiduciary capacity in violation of Standards 61, 62, and 63 of State Bar Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. The Respondent further failed to file a response to the client’s complaint or to cooperate with the Investigative Panel in its investigation of the complaint in violation of Standard 68 of State Bar Rule 4-102.

*324Decided July 12, 1990.William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Viola S. Drew, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

¶2The Review Panel recommended that the Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of one (1) year, unless within thirty (30) days of the Order of the Supreme Court he provides a complete accounting of funds of the estate to the General Counsel’s office and to the Complainant or her attorney and reimburses the Complainant for whatever remains of the $371 attorney fees he has not already reimbursed her.

¶3If the General Counsel’s Office certifies to the Supreme Court that Respondent has made the accounting and reimbursed the complainant within the thirty (30) day time period, then Respondent shall receive a public reprimand.

¶4This Court adopts the recommendation of the Review Panel.

All the Justices concur.
/260/ga/323 · .json · Public domain