Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Ga. 338 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 358 - State v. Saltarelli · 146 Ga. App. 237 - Walker v. State · Harrell v. State · Cooper v. State · Mangrum v. Union Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen evidence admitted for one purpose is potentially unfairly prejudicial to a party, that party is entitled to have the court instruct the jury to limit its consideration to the one purpose for which the evidence is admissible. [Cits.].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.