¶1The appellant, Jack McCrief, was convicted of trafficking in cocaine, under OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, McCrief v. State, 193 Ga. App. 667 (388 SE2d 859) (1988), and we granted certiorari to determine whether Lockwood v. State, 257 Ga. 796 (364 SE2d 574) (1988), is controlling. We hold that it is not, and we affirm.
¶2Mr. McCrief was arrested on June 19, 1988, after being stopped for a traffic violation. While issuing the citation, the police officer noticed Mr. McCrief acting in a suspicious manner. The officer requested and received permission to perform a pat-down search. During the pat-down search, Mr. McCrief attempted to flee and in the process tried to discard a package which proved to contain approximately 109 grams of cocaine. He was indicted for trafficking in cocaine.
¶3The trial court gave jury instructions on the law of actual and constructive possession. Mr. McCrief was convicted, and now appeals his conviction on the grounds that the instruction on constructive possession is reversible error under Lockwood v. State, supra. We find no error.
¶4Prior to March 1988, the State had to show that the accused had actual possession of the contraband to attain a conviction for trafficking in cocaine under OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). See Lockwood v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 798.
¶5Shortly after Lockwood, the Georgia General Assembly amended *88OCGA § 16-13-31 (a) to delete the actual possession requirement. This amendment became effective March 28, 1988, more than two months before Mr. McCrief committed his offense. (See Ga. L. 1988, pp. 420-424.) Therefore, this case is not controlled by Lockwood, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
¶6Judgment affirmed.