Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Ind. 663 - Adams v. State

Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
11
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Norris v. State (1979), 159 Ind. App. 663 - Brattain v. Herron (1974)

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions — followed in 11 states

17019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Draper v. United States · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Dionisio · Davis v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We thus conclude that the present record shows no violation of petitioner’s right under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. It bears repeating, however, that we reach this judgment only on the facts of the present record. The integrity of an individual’s person is a cherished value of our society. That we today hold that the Constitution does not forbid the States minor intrusions into an individual’s body under stringently limited conditions in no way indicates that it permits more substantial intrusions, or intrusions under other conditions.” Id. at 772 , 1 86 S.Ct. at 1836 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Coerced confessions offend the community’s sense of fair play and decency. So here, to sanction the brutal conduct which naturally enough was condemned by the court whose judgment is before us, would be to afford brutality the cloak of law. Nothing would be more calculated to discredit law and thereby to brutalize the temper of a society.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The Court was careful to leave open to the states the power to fix the parameters of permissible police investigative conduct. Thus, in our view, we are free, within the limits of the applicable constitutional provisions, to determine the permissible seope of searches and seizures of the kind here before us."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.