Roach v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1970
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Davis v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [ Appellant ] makes no contention that this plea was coerced or was entered when he was not duly advised by his counsel or that the court acted improperly in accepting his plea. * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roach v. Bennett“interesting question as to whether appellant had a constitutional right to the assistance of state-appointed counsel in the prosecution of habeas corpus action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roach v. Bennett““Since statements allegedly given were not introduced or considered in a trial, the rights announced in Escobedo and Miranda could not have been violated. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Blake v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.