Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Kan. 263 - State v. Webber

State v. Webber’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
6
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Connecticut v. Porter (1997), State v. Jamison (2000)

77 state decisions

3201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Soberon v. United States · State v. Timley · State v. Fike · State v. Vandiver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a complaint, information or indictment charges a crime but fails to specify the particulars of the crime sufficiently to enable the defendant to prepare a defense the court may, on written motion of the defendant, require the prosecuting attorney to furnish the defendant with a bill of particulars. At the trial the state’s evidence shall be confined to the particulars of the bill.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In reviewing a trial court decision regarding the suppression of evidence, we review the factual underpinnings of the decision by a substantial competent evidence standard of review and review the ultimate legal decision drawn from those facts de novo with independent judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when a trait of a person's character is relevant as tending to prove conduct on a specified occasion . . . evidence of specific instances of conduct other than evidence of conviction of a crime which tends to prove the trait to be bad shall be inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.