In re Blase’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘In State v. Klassen, 207 Kan. 414, 415 , 485 P.2d 1295 (1971), we explained diat we have a “duty in a disciplinary proceeding to examine the evidence and determine for ourselves the judgment to be entered.' ” In State v. Zeigler, 217 Kan. 748, 755 , 538 P.2d 643 (1975), this court stated that, although the report of the disciplinary board “is advisory only, it will be given the same dignity as a special verdict by a jury, or the findings of a trial court, and will be adopted where amply sustained by the evidence, or where it is not against die clear weight of the evidence, or where the evidence consisted of sharply conflicting testimony.” See In re Farmer, 242 Kan. 296, 299 , 747 P.2d 97 (1987).’ ” (Quoting In re Carson, 252 Kan. 399, 406 , 845 P.2d 47 [1993].)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Lucas