Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Kan. 471 - State v. Green

State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2023

16 state decisions

1001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Abel · State v. Timley · State v. Otero · State v. Knighten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) If any person charged with a crime and held in jail solely by reason thereof shall not be brought to trial within ninety (90) days after such person’s arraignment on die charge, such person shall be entided to be discharged from further liability to be tried for die crime charged, unless the delay shall happen as a result of the application or fault of the defendant, or a continuance shall be ordered by the court under subsection (3). “(3) The time for trial may be extended beyond die limitations of subsections (1) and (2) of this section for any of the following reasons: (c) There is material evidence which is unavailable; diat reasonable efforts have been made to procure such evidence; and that diere are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence can be obtained and trial commenced within the next succeeding ninety (90) days. Not more than one continuance may be granted die state on diis ground, unless for good cause shown . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once a grand jury has handed down an indictment, a determination of probable cause has been made and a preliminary hearing is no longer necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.