Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Ky. 313 - Hazelip v. Doyel

Hazelip v. Doyel’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1982
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1982

4 state decisions

20193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. King · Ewell v. Jackson · Rogers v. Biggstaff's · Farris v. Matthews · Ralls v. Sharp's Adm'r

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that it is essential to the validity of a judgment that it shall be entered upon the order book of the court, and signed by a judge, and that an unsigned judgment is no judgment at all.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.