Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 La. 784 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1997

18 state decisions

120197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wright · State v. Barksdale · State v. Ash · State v. Michel · State v. Straughan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; * * *." (Emphasis here and elsewhere supplied).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The fundamental requirement is that the bill of information or indictment must contain all the essential elements of the crime intended to be charged in sufficient particularity (1) to enable the defendant to prepare for trial, as well as (2) to allow the court to determine the propriety of the evidence which is submitted upon the trial and to impose the correct punishment upon a verdict of guilty, and (3) to afford protection from subsequent prosecution for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.