State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Maiden · State v. Dore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court on any ground unless in the opinion of the court after an examination of the entire record, it appears that the error complained of has probably resulted in a miscarriage of justice, is prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused, or constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Every error in the admission of evidence, however, does not require that the conviction be set aside. See State v. Maiden, 258 La. 417 , 246 So.2d 810 (1971). The test for reversible error is set forth in the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.