Heath v. Gloster’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
September 1974
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Langley v. Kirker · Daly v. Kramer · Heath v. Gloster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule that a vendor is precluded from forfeiting a land contract when he himself is in default in making payments on the mortgage is not applicable under the present circumstances. The defendant is largely responsible for vendor’s defaults, and could have protected herself under the contract. The rule cannot be invoked in the present case for the purpose of escaping payment and at the same time retaining possession of the property. See Daly v. Kramer, 235 Mich. 581 ; Langley v. Kirker, 247 Mich. 443, 445 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stryker v. Marschner““ * * * This would not excuse her from paying the balance of $200 that was due. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.