Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 MINN 104 - Brown v. Agin

Brown v. Agin’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2022

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

801961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 351 Ill. App. 158 - Milewski v. Milewski · Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Brajovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Hynan v. FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF ST. PAUL · First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the insured intended to change the beneficiary and (2) whether [the insured] took affirmative action or otherwise did substantially all that he could do to demonstrate that intention without regard to whether he complied with the change-of-policy beneficiary provision in the policy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]uch provisions are for the protection of the insurer, and where, as here, the insurance company has deposited the proceeds of the policy to be paid in accordance with the order of the court, it has waived any defense it might have to the claim of either party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e must be guided by the principle that, where an action is tried by the court without a jury, the findings of fact are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury and will not be reversed on appeal unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence. This is so even though the reviewing court might itself have come to a different conclusion if it had been the fact-finding body.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.