Oldendorf v. Eide’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2006
2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Floen v. Sund · Foster v. Bock · Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. · Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. · Kraus v. Saffert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * It must be conceded that there was evidence upon which a jury might find that defendant’s truck was out of control and skidded into plaintiffs’ car because of uncontrollable factors rather than because of defendant’s negligence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gran v. Dasovic
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.