Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 N.C. App. 311 - State v. Perez

260 N.C. App. 311 - State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Moore · State v. Todd · 171 N.C. App. 277 - State v. English

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the trial court erred by permitting him to stipulate to the admission of the forensic laboratory reports without engaging in a colloquy to ensure he understood the consequences of that decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “did not understand the implications of stipulating to the admission of the lab reports at trial, his recourse is to pursue a motion for appropriate relief asserting ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “request to impose on the trial courts an obligation to personally address a defendant whose attorney seeks to waive any of his constitutional rights via stipulation with the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.