Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 N.C. App. 394 - State v. Hobbs

260 N.C. App. 394 - State v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Henderson v. Brown · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · Barakat v. Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his Court has consistently held that a trial court is not required to give a defendant's requested instruction verbatim. Rather, when the defendant's request is correct in law and supported by the evidence, the court must give the instruction in substance. This rule applies even when the requested instructions are based on language from opinions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.