State v. Sheets’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Bourjaily v. United States · Idaho v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the U.S. Supreme Court determined that when a witness is unavailable for cross-examination, his or her statements are admissible only if they bear adequate indicia of reliability. Reliability can be inferred, without more, in a case in which the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception. In other cases, the evidence must be excluded, absent a showing by the State of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vaught“A circumstance in which a declarant admits his or her presence and participation in a crime, but indicates that another was the 'mastermind' or primary actor, is one of the more common fact patterns in which courts hold that a declarant's statements inculpating the defendant may not be admitted at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Stevens v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.