State v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Arizona v. Evans · Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York · McGrain v. Daugherty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Cjourts have the inherent power to do those things reasonably necessary for the administration of justice in the exercise of their jurisdiction [and] courts are charged with the duty of guarding their proceedings against everything which interferes with the orderly administration of justice, and ... the power to punish for violation of its orders or judgments is inherent in every court having common-law jurisdiction.... [T]he power to punish for contempt is incident to every judicial tribune, derived from its very constitution, without any expressed statutory aid and inherent in all courts of record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In order for such a warrant to be valid, however, the face of the warrant, must: (1) set forth the facts giving rise to probable cause for the issuance of the warrant, and (2) affirmatively state that the issuing judge either (a) personally witnessed the events recited in the warrant or (b) personally reviewed the official records of the court, thus ensuring that the validity of the data in the court records is adequately scrutinized by the issuing judge or magistrate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Milner v. Duncklee“common” for drug users to keep drugs in their homes. 6 . In Johnson , the Nebraska Supreme Court held that the good faith exception did not apply, because the affidavit omitted the detail that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.