Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 N.Y. 162 - Rosenberg v. Schwartz

Rosenberg v. Schwartz’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
5
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo (1938), Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp. (1943)

20 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

220193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Herzog · Schumer v. Caplin · DeHaen v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of Massachusetts · Moore v. Charles T. Wills, Inc. · Besner v. . Central Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jury might reasonably have found that the plaintiff's injury was the direct result of the defendant's negligence. The plaintiff was not required to offer evidence which positively excluded every other possible cause of the accident.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is present and sees and realizes that a subcontractor is doing his work in an unlawful and dangerous manner,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.