Hassell v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2003
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Willard v. Willard · Wolfe v. Stanford · Holland v. Shaffer · Sweeney v. Bay State Oil & Gas Co. · Hargis v. Hargis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Hargis v. Hargis, 181 Okl. 377 , 73 P.2d 1129 , we recognized the equitable nature of the decrees and orders of the District Court in partition cases and held that same will not be disturbed by this court in the absence of a showing of substantial prejudice caused thereby.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Murray v. Eagle · Mauch v. Mauch“inability of a cotenant to purchase should not constitute a defense under ordinary circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.