Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 Pa. Super. 85 - Commonwealth v. Cottle

260 Pa. Super. 85 - Commonwealth v. Cottle’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Riggins · Commonwealth v. Martin · Commonwealth v. Kates · Commonwealth v. Kostka · 234 Pa. Super. 31 - Commonwealth v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At that time, the defendant [Ernest Cottle], stepped up and stated he wanted to say something. Judge Nix advised him not to say anything, but he wanted to say something. He was taken to the District Attorney’s office, Detective Hahn interviewed him. The victim still cannot identify the defendant. Normally, Your Honorable, I would ask for a more stringent sentence, but since he came in and pled guilty, I would ask for a sentence of six to twenty three months.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.