Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 S.C. 187 - State v. Bottoms

State v. Bottoms’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2003

11 state decisions

401973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parsons v. Commonwealth · Hawkins v. State · State v. Adams · McMillan v. RIDGES · State v. Stockman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ The general rule is almost universally recognized that evidence of extrajudicial statements made by a witness who is not a party and whose declarations are not binding as admissions is admissible only to impeach or discredit the witness, and is not competent as substantive evidence of the facts to which such statements relate’.” 260 S. C. 193, 195 S. E. (2d) 118 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.