260 So. 2d 255
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1972
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-04-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1974
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
““The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 353 .””
quoted by 1 later decision, including 280 So. 2d 703 - McClendon v. Wainwright
Relies on 235 So. 2d 353 - Rose v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1972-04-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment and sentence imposed on defendant following a plea of guilty to aggravated assault. The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 353.
¶2Affirmed.