¶1By this appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offenses of aiding and assisting in the conducting of a lottery, possession of lottery tickets, and possession of lottery devices, appellant contends primarily that there is an absence of sufficient proof as to venue. Appellee, State, contends that appellant failed to preserve the foregoing point on appeal by not timely filing a motion for new trial. The record reflects that appellant preserved the foregoing point on appeal by timely filing a motion for judgment of acquittal. It is our conclusion, after considering the cause upon the merits, that the judgment appealed should be and is hereby affirmed.
260 So. 2d 878
Lee v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 25, 1972
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-04-25
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1972-04-25
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2002
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →