Becker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Helmig v. State · Williams v. State · State v. Smith · State v. McTush
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court has no obligation to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense unless a basis exists for acquitting the defendant of the greater offense charged and convicting him of the lesser-included offense. “A lesser[-] included[-] offense instruction is not required where there is strong and substantial proof of the offense charged, and the evidence does not suggest a questionable essential element of the more serious offense charged.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arnold v. State“involving the penetration of the sex organ or anus by a finger, instrument or object. Soto v. State , 226 S.W.3d 164 , 166 (Mo. banc 2007). In other words,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Treatment P.L.“[a] person can commit the crime of statutory sodomy simply by touching the victim's genitals with a hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Treatment P.L.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.