Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 S.W.3d 927

State v. Preston

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-09-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 The defendant, Donald W. Preston, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County following his conviction by a jury of one count of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance (methamphetamine), section 195.211 RSMo. (Supp.2007). The court sentenced the defendant as a prior drug offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

¶3 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶4 We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/260/sw3d/927 · .json · Public domain