Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

260 S.W.3d 929

State v. Murphy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-09-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Oscar Murphy appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

/260/sw3d/929 · .json · Public domain