260 U.S. 702
Docket No. 133.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1922-11-20
1 counsel of record
Relies on Hulbert v. City of Chicago · Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. · Cleveland Pittsburgh Railroad Company v. City of Cleveland Ohio
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-11-20
Cited by 9 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1982
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
¶2Mr. Max Isaac for plaintiff in error. Mr. George M. Napier, for defendant in error, submitted.
¶4Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U. S. 275, 280; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee River Rower Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344.