Fishback v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
53
cited by 53 later decisions
3
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
47 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. South Carolina · McDougall v. North Carolina · Frye v. Commonwealth · Clagett v. Commonwealth · Peterson v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Hjenceforth juries shall be instructed, as a matter of law, on the abolition of parole for non-capital felony offenses committed on or after January 1, 1995 pursuant to Code § 53.1 165.1. In addition, because Code § 53.1-40.01 is in the nature of a parole statute, where applicable juries shall also be instructed on the possibility of geriatric release pursuant to that statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘the trial court is not required to amend or correct an erroneous instruction, but ... when the principle of law is materially vital to a defendant in a criminal case, it is reversible error for the trial court to refuse a defective instruction instead of correcting it and giving it in the proper form.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he determination of a prisoner's eligibility for geriatric release is essentially a mathematical calculation,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State · Booker v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.