Curtis v. Bindeman’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2004
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on In Re Challenge to Nominating Petition of Haworth · 26 N.J. Super. 363 - In Re Wene
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [voting] statute should be liberally construed so as not to deny innocent voters their right to vote, or to upset an election for technical reasons.” 7 .In this case, we explicitly recognized that we were dealing with the concept of residence as opposed to domicile. Id. at 648 . 8 . He also argues that a definition of “residence” should not apply to an interpretation of "has resided.” We do not so clearly separate the meanings of a noun and a verb connoting the same concept. 9 . The definitions contained in § 1-1302 are "for the purposes of this subchapter,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.