Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 ALA 290 - Neelley v. State

Neelley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1985

12 state decisions

601954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Sullivan · 20 Ala. App. 412 - Spelce v. State · Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Burgess · National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Spigener · Sherrill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]here must be similarity of conditions to give an experiment sufficient probative value to warrant its admission, and if the conditions were dissimilar in an essential particular, the evidence should be rejected. But the authorities are to the effect that it is not necessary that the conditions should be exactly identical. A reasonable or substantial similarity suffices, and the lack of exact identity affects only the weight and not the competency of the evidence. It is for the court to determine whether the conditions are sufficiently similar to warrant admission of this proof, and much must be left to the sound discretion of the trial judge. 22 C.J. 759, 756; 32 C.J.S., Evidence, §§ 590, 587."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “similarity in the essential conditions at the time of the occurrence and at the time of the experiment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.