In Re Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 302 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 554
Relies on Lockwood v. Exchange Bank · Vasilion v. Vasilion · Union Savings Bank v. Augie/Restivo Baking Co. · In Re Ford · Jones v. Conwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“possess[es] in the two estates the entire ownership of the property and may, just as the spouses could before bankruptcy, unite the two interests in the execution of a single deed and thereby convey the property to a third party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bunker v. Peyton“[t]here is nothing improper with the manner in which the [Thomases] maintained their accounts and personal finances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bunker v. Peyton“substantial, almost total, commingling of assets and liabilities,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bunker v. Peyton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.