State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Patterson (2005), State v. Sanchez (2003)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · In re Reidt · State v. Webb · State v. Newsome · State v. Ferguson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he requisite agreement or confederation may be inferred from proof of the separate acts of the individuals accused as coconspirators and from the circumstances surrounding the commission of these acts.... Further, [c]onspiracy can seldom be proved by direct evidence. It may be inferred from the activities of the accused persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the jury rejected the state's claim that [Green] had conspired with Clark to kill [the victim].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] conspiracy can be formed in a very short time period....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.