Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 261 CONN 721 - Feldmann v. Sebastian

Feldmann v. Sebastian’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. Feldman (2008), Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican (2008)

28 state decisions

180200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc. · Hillman v. Town of Greenwich · Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp. · State v. Messa · Chapel-High Corp. v. Cavallaro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he power of taking property by attachment, before any just debt or claim has been established, is an extraordinary power, given by statute, against common right; and no title can be acquired by its exercise, except by strict compliance with the terms of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily, we review a trial court's actions with respect to an application for a prejudgment remedy for abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “adhered to these principles of strict construction dealing with various aspects of prejudgment remedy statutory schemes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.