Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

261 F. 48

Docket No. 5347.

O'Donnell v. Gillespie

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1919.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1919-09-22

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.</p> <p>Suit by E. N. Gillespie against Dennis O’Donnell. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1919

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Washburn v. Gillespie · Wright v. Gillespie

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by Kimbrough Stone · Decided 1919-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.

¶2Suit by E. N. Gillespie against Dennis O’Donnell. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4John B. Arnold, of New York City, and P. W. Cress, of Perry, Okl., for appellant.

¶5Robert J. Dodds, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (W. A. Sipe, Jr., of Tulsa, Okl., on the-brief), for appellee.

¶6Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.

¶7STONE, Circuit Judge.

¶8This is another of the similar cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41, - C. C. A. -, decided at this term. The contentions are embraced in those determined in the case of Washburn and the case of Wright v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A.-, also decided at this term. The additional claim that the lease was to have been like the Wright lease and was to be nonassignable was determined adversely by the trial court, with whose conclusion we agree.

¶9The decree should be affirmed.

/261/f1d/48 · .json · Public domain