Lynch v. Call’s Empirical Analysis
261 F.2d 130 · 1958
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2015
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southport Transit Co. v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc. · Alaniz v. United States · Holcomb v. Ætna Life Insurance · United States v. Brookridge Farm, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The salutary, indeed the desirable and efficacious, purpose of a pre-trial conference is to sift the discovered and discoverable facts to determine the triable issues, both factual and legal, and to chart the course of the lawsuit accordingly. If, as is often the case, no disputed facts survive the pre-trial discovery and conferences, a summary judgment is timely and appropriate. Holicomb v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 225 F. 2d 577 . . . .” (See, also, Wirtz v. Young Electric Sign Company, 315 F. 2d 326 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.